Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, is often revered by advocates for the advancements she made in reproductive freedom. Many see her as a hero and a fearless leader for the advancement of women. Planned Parenthood’s website proclaims that: “Women's progress in recent decades — in education, in the workplace, in political and economic power — can be directly linked to Sanger's crusade and women's ability to control their own fertility.”1
The highest award that Planned Parenthood gives is the
Margaret Sanger Award. This year, when Nancy Pelosi accepted the Margaret
Sanger Award, she spoke of Sanger saying, “Margaret Sanger understood that
women should never be silent – not when their fundamental rights are at
stake. She knew that positive change seldom came to those who waited; it
came to those who worked and struggled, who acted, agitated, and fought for
equality. She recognized, as your theme declares this evening, that women
are ‘stronger together.’”2
But Margaret Sanger’s legacy is a little more complicated
than it would initially seem. For example, Margaret Sanger refused to condemn
the “female hygiene” products that were starting to be marketed in the 1930s.
These products were marked as a way of preventing pregnancy, but in reality,
the majority of these products did nothing to prevent pregnancies. The
manufacturers were taking advantage of women’s fears of pregnancy to sell their
products to gain higher profits. Not only were the products ineffective, but
they could also be quite dangerous, risking permanent damage to a woman’s body,
and even death. Margaret Sanger refused to take a stance against these
manufactures, despite the fact that they were contributing to the injury and
death of women. She was quoted as saying that the reason she would not condemn
them was “they have not lagged behind like the medical profession but have gone
ahead and answered [a] growing and urgent need.” 3 But by not speaking out against these manufacturers, it
appears that Margaret Sanger seemed more
interested in promoting her ideology than she did in ensuring the safety and
well-being of the women affected by it; she had forsaken the women that she
claimed to desire to help.
Margaret Sanger even spoke out against maternity centers
where “Such women are to be visited by nurses and to receive instruction in the
hygiene of pregnancy, to be guided in making arrangements for confinements to
be invited to come to the doctor s clinics for examination and supervision.
They are we [sic] are informed, to receive adequate care during pregnancy at
confinement and for one month afterward.”4 These maternity centers
that were sponsored by private charities existed to help poor women with their
pregnancies by providing them with proper health care and education. Margaret
Sanger believed that these centers did women a disservice, saying the programs
were “not merely superficial and near sighted. It conceals a stupid cruelty,
because it is not courageous enough to face unpleasant facts. Aside from the
question of the unfitness of many women to become mothers, aside from the very
definite deterioration in the human stock that such programs would inevitably
hasten, we may question its value even to the normal though unfortunate mother.
For it is never the intention of such philanthropy to give the poor over
burdened and often undernourished mother of the slum the opportunity to make
the choice herself to decide whether she wishes time after to time to bring
children into the world.”4 She saw these programs not only as
useless, but cruel because they did not provide birth control for these women.
Instead of recognizing the merits of these centers and the obvious need for
them, she harshly criticizes them for not conforming to her ideology. It is
interesting to parallel this view with the relationship between Planned
Parenthood and pregnancy resource centers today. Planned Parenthood has often
criticized pregnancy resource centers because they are not in line with their
ideology, because they refuse to refer for abortions or provide birth control.
There seems to be a refusal to admit the value of these centers or acknowledge
any good that they might be doing because the centers refuse to embrace the
same ideology that Planned Parenthood advocates.
Finally, and possibly most disturbing, is the eugenic
agenda to which Margaret Sanger adhered. Margaret Sanger pushed the use of
birth control to contribute to the eugenic ends she idealized. In Sanger’s
autobiography, she writes about a lecture she gave on the seven circumstances
in which birth control should be practiced. The third circumstance was “when
parents, though normal, had subnormal children,” the fourth was “when husband
and wife were adolescent,” and the fifth was “when the earning capacity of the father
was inadequate.”5 She found that these circumstances produced less
desirable children, or that the parents were not fit to be parents.
Margaret Sanger is seen as one of the biggest proponents of ‘reproductive freedom.’ Yet it seems that she doesn't truly desire reproductive freedom for all - only for those she saw as able parents (meaning the middle or upper, white class). In her autobiography she elaborates saying “anyone, no matter how ignorant, how diseased mentally or physically, how lacking in all knowledge of children, seemed to consider he or she had a right to parent.”5 Sanger seems to believe that only certain people have the right to parent. So she promotes birth control for those who she does not see as able to parent according to her standards. She does not advocate parenting classes, or attempt to help those “lacking in all knowledge of children,” but instead believes that they simply should not be parents, which is where birth control comes in.
Margaret Sanger is seen as one of the biggest proponents of ‘reproductive freedom.’ Yet it seems that she doesn't truly desire reproductive freedom for all - only for those she saw as able parents (meaning the middle or upper, white class). In her autobiography she elaborates saying “anyone, no matter how ignorant, how diseased mentally or physically, how lacking in all knowledge of children, seemed to consider he or she had a right to parent.”5 Sanger seems to believe that only certain people have the right to parent. So she promotes birth control for those who she does not see as able to parent according to her standards. She does not advocate parenting classes, or attempt to help those “lacking in all knowledge of children,” but instead believes that they simply should not be parents, which is where birth control comes in.
The quotes above indicate that Margaret Sanger was not,
in fact, a true advocate of reproductive freedom. Margaret Sanger was a diehard
eugenicist, believing the reproduction should be limited to those who she saw
as able parents. This eugenic mindset is evident throughout her writings and
work.
The legacy that Margaret Sanger left was not one of
dedicated care for all women. Instead, she pushed her ideology at all costs.
Planned Parenthood continues to follow in the footsteps of their beloved founder,
as shown in Live Action’s latest videos [warning-explicit] exposing the
danger in which Planned Parenthood puts children.
And what about those maternity centers that Margaret Sanger saw as useless and even cruel? These are the groups and organizations that promote true women’s freedom. Groups that strive to empower women to take
charge of their own lives, by helping to give them the tools to do so. Groups
like the Women’s Care Center, the Guiding Star Project, Hannah’s House, Seton Home, and so many more. There is a better way to help moms and babies. We
should be supporting these organizations in their view of authentic women’s
freedom through whatever way we can, be that volunteering, donating, writing
letters, or praying. Because being pro-life is being pro-woman. I believe in
women’s freedom. Do you?
- http://www.plannedparenthood.org/about-us/who-we-are/history-successes#early
- http://www.democraticleader.gov/newsroom/press-releases/pelosi-remarks-accepting-margaret-sanger-award-planned-parenthood-annual-gala/
- Tone, Andrea. Controlling Reproduction: An American History. Wilmington, DE: SR, 1997. 228-29. Print.
- Sanger, Margaret. The Pivot of Civilization. Elmsford, NY: Maxwell Reprint, 1969. 114-16. Print.
- DuPont, Kathryn. Margaret Sanger an Autobiography. Lanham: Cooper Square Press, 1999. 193-195. Print.